ScoutX platform
Shoppers describe the unit. The site finds it.
A shopper does not think in your filter taxonomy. They think "something the whole family fits in that I can afford at around three hundred a month", and there is no checkbox for that sentence on any dealer site in this category.
Where filters break down in powersports
Multi-franchise inventory makes filtering worse, not better. A shopper who does not care which manufacturer made it has to either pick one or wade through all of them, and the filter sidebar forces a decision they have not made yet.
Search sidesteps the taxonomy entirely. Seats, displacement, price, payment, condition, brand, location — parsed out of a sentence and run against live inventory across every line you carry.
- Brand-agnostic by default, brand-aware when the shopper names one
- Location-aware for multi-store groups
- Falls back to conventional filters rather than a dead end
Payment is a first-class search term
More powersports shoppers arrive with a monthly number in mind than with a purchase price. Search handles payment directly, so "under $300 a month" returns units rather than nothing — which is what happens on a site where payment lives only in a calculator widget.
Also in the platform
Each one leans on the others
AI shopping concierge
Covers the evenings your showroom is closed and hands over the whole conversation.
Conversion-built lead capture
Multi-step forms that hand you a usable lead even when the shopper stops halfway.
Site speed
96 mobile, 82 desktop on Google Lighthouse — measured on the Scout platform.
Detail
Plain-English inventory search — questions
What happens when nothing matches?+
The shopper sees the nearest alternatives with the relaxed constraint named — "nothing four-seat under $20k, here are three at $21,500" — instead of an empty page, which is where sessions end.
Do conventional filters go away?+
No. Both are available; shoppers who prefer filters keep them.
Does it cover PG&A as well as major units?+
Major units are where it does the real work. Parts and apparel search is more conventional because the shopping behaviour is different — people search parts by fitment, not by description.